Advertisement
Desktop970x250
3News
Advertisement
Desktop970x250

Election Petition: Bring your written submissions by Feb 17 – Supreme Court to all parties

By Laud Nartey
SHARE
3 min read
Election Petition: Bring your written submissions by Feb 17 – Supreme Court to all parties

The Supreme Court has instructed lawyers for the petitioner and the respondents in the ongoing presidential election petition hearing to file their written submissions by Wednesday, February 17.

The apex court made the order on Thursday, February 11 after a ruling that the Chair of the Electoral Commission (EC) and other witnesses cannot be compelled to mount the witness box to be cross-examined.

Lawyer for the petitioner Tsatsu Tsikata has already served notice he will file for a review of the ruling and also subpoena Jean Adukwei Mensa.

“We are applying to reopen our case and on that basis we are issuing a subpoena addressed to the chairperson of the electoral commission of Ghana,” he said.

This comes after the Supreme Court said that the Chair of the Electoral Commission (EC) and the Campaign Director of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) in last year’s elections, Peter Mac Manu, cannot be compelled to mount the witness box to be cross-examined in the ongoing election petition.

During proceedings on Tuesday, February 9, lawyers for the 1st and 2nd respondents, Justin Amenuvor and Akoto Ampaw respectively, told the Court that the petitioner cannot compel them to elect witnesses to appear in the witness box.

“The petitioner cannot compel us to enter the witness box to adduce evidence,” Mr Akoto Ampaw said.

He added: “The petitioner has adduced evidence and closed his case. We have taken the position that in our assessment, they have not discharged the burden of proof and the burden of producing evidence and, therefore, we will not give further evidence and the Court will determine the case on the evidence before it.”

Lawyers for the two respondents on Monday, February 8 moved to close their cases without their witnesses being cross-examined.

This was after Counsel for the petitioner Tsatsu Tsikata closed his case.

He had told the court during the legal arguments that the chair of the 1st Respondent, Jean Mensa, cannot skip cross-examination.

He argued that by filing a witness statement, the 1st Respondent has opened herself up for cross-examination.

“It is our respectful submission that by filing its witness statement the first respondent has clearly crossed the bridge as far as opening the witness up for cross-examination is concerned. That bridge has been crossed, the ship has already been sailed,” Tsatsu said in his argument to the bench.

But the court dismissed his objection on the heels that a witness cannot be compelled to mount the witness box.

 “We also intend to apply for a review of the ruling,” he had said afterwards.

By Laud Nartey|editors.3news.com|Ghana

Sign up to The Daily Briefing

Stay informed with the most relevant stories shaping Ghana and the world, every morning and evening.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy.

Share This Article

Laud Nartey is an online editor with current affair team at Media General, operators of TV3 Ghana, 3News.com and more. Email: Laud.Nartey@editors.3news.com

Advertisement
Desktop300x250

Up Next

Advertisement
Desktop970x250