Bagbin’s verbal attack on Akufo-Addo is most unfortunate – Majority Leader

0
308
Speaker (L) and Outgone Majority Leader Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsu
Advertisement

The Majority Leader Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu has described the verbal attacks on President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo by the Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin over the inability of the president to sign the Witchcraft and Ghana Armed Forces Bills, as unfortunate.

He said the speaker could have ended his comments after disagreeing with the president but going ahead to unleash an attack on hin was not the best.

The Suame lawmaker indicated that “If the Speaker disagrees with him, it is legitimate, and he could have ended at that. I disagree with the opinion of the president. Then maybe I also come up with my understanding of the law. But we all saw and heard the rather visceral language of the speaker.

“I thought it was most unfortunate. The Speaker, after reading it, goes on his own frolic and attacks the president, and I felt it was most unfortunate.”

Mr Bagbin had rejected the position of President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo on the Criminal Offences Amendment and the  Bills.

In his view, the President had not been properly advised on the bills passed by Parliament on Tuesday, July 25.

President  earlier notified  of his inability to assent to the Criminal Offences Amendment Bill 2022.

This was after he raised constitutional matters regarding the Bill.

In the letter he wrote to Parliament and read by the  on Monday, December 4,  said “I am writing to you in reference to our meeting held on the 28th of November, 2023 at my office where we discussed the outstanding bills presented for assent namely; the Criminal Offenses Amendment Bill 2023, Criminal Offences Amendment number 2 Bill 2023, and the Armed Forces Amendment Bill 2023.

“During our conversation, I raised specific constitutional concerns regarding these bills related to Article 108 of the Constitution, particularly the nature of these bills which were introduced into Parliament as private members’ bills rather than being presented by me or on my behalf….”

“As I indicated the content of these bills have my support, but we need to ensure that they are enacted in line with established constitutional and legislative process. After thorough consideration and in light of the constitutional issue I pointed out during our meeting, I am unable to assent to these bills.

“The concerns raised are significant and have profound implications for the constitutional integrity of these legislative actions. Any legislation we pass must be in complete alignment with the provisions of our Constitution. I intend to have these bills reintroduced in Parliament on my behalf in due course,” he added.

Regarding the , a private members bill sponsored by Madina lawmaker , President Akufo-Addo, in the letter indicated his inability to sign after citing financial implications on the state’ Consolidated Fund and potential breaches of Article 108 of the Constitution as reasons for his refusal.

Reacting to the President’s stance, Mr  said, “Vehemently, we disagree with the position taken by the President. The President has gotten it tragically wrong and I will submit in the form of a statement under article 53 my position in this matter and allow members of the House to make comments so that we can take a clear position in this matter.

“And I will do so during this week. The President has not been properly advised. The President has not been properly informed about the processes this bill has gone through. So I will submit a detailed write-up on it for members to make their comments but I am very clear that this message and the contents are irregular, wrongful and unconstitutional.

“The responsibility to decide whether a bill should come from a private member or not rests on the person presiding. The procedure in the act clearly states what the President is expected to do. It is not for the President to decide on the constitutionality or otherwise of a bill that has been presented and considered by Parliament. This  of Parliament will not be taken away by any executive authority,” he said.