I don’t think Bagbin authored the statement reacting to the Supreme Court ruling – Majority Leader

Speaker (L) and Majority Leader Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsu who alleged that a wealthy businessman attempted to bribe NPP lawmakers who were demanding the dismissal of the Finance Minister to rescind their decision.

The Majority Leader in Parliament, Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu has said, given the kind of language used in the statement reacting to the Supreme Court ruling on Deputy Speakers’ voting right, he doubt if it was Speaker Alban Bagbin who actually authored the statement.

“I am looking at the language that has been employed , I don’t want to believe that it is from the Speaker. I even sent a message inquiring whether this is from him, he hasn’t responded yet. I have always insisted that Deputy Speakers cannot be denied their votes,” the Suame lawmaker told TV3 in an exclusive interview on Friday March 11.

Speaker Bagbin criticized the Supreme Court for the ruling they gave in relation to Deputy Speakers voting in Parliament while presiding in the House.

He said the ruling is not only an absurdity but a reckless incursion into the remit of Parliament.

“I have resisted the temptation of making a comment on the judgment of the Supreme Court on the issue of the voting rights of Deputy Speakers when presiding. But the unfortunate and myopic comment of the President has compelled me to let it out.

“The SC decision, is to say the least, not only an absurdity but a reckless incursion into the remit of Parliament.

“The trend of unanimity is equally troubling. It doesn’t help explore and expand our legal jurisprudence. The President’s comment is myopic and unfortunate. It only goes to worsen the schism between the Executive and Parliament.

“The impartiality of the Speaker, Deputy Speaker or Presiding Officer has been tresusured and fought for by this country throughout our democratic development. Mr. President, the issue being discussed is not about Parliament being above the law. Everyone knows that Parliament is not above the law.

READ ALSO:  Supreme Court can always shoot down laws passed by Parliament that are against the Constitution - O.B Amoah

The Executive and the Judiciary are equally not above the law. The issue being discussed is the political question doctrine. It took centuries to detail out the strands of this doctrine and the principles are settled as to when and how this closed book could be opened. Please, I encourage the Plaintiff to go for a review.”

The apex court on Wednesday March 9 dismissed an application to pronounce as unconstitutional, Joseph Osei Wusu’s action of counting himself for the purposes of quorum.

Justice Jones Dotse ruled that the Deputy Speaker of Parliament participation in voting was constitutional.

Private legal practitioner and law lecturer, Justice Abdulai subsequent to the November 30, 2021 clash between Speaker Bagbin and his First Deputy after the latter overturned an earlier vote of the House rejecting Government’s 2022 Budget invited the Supreme Court to pronounce as unconstitutional, Deputy Speaker, Joseph Osei Owusu’s action of counting himself for the purposes of quorum.

He argued in the context of articles 102 and 104 of the 1992 Constitution that the Deputy Speaker was not permitted to count himself for the purposes of quorum, since he had neither an original nor a casting vote as Speaker presiding.

But the 7-member panel of justices ruled that the Member of Parliament for Bekwai exercised his right constitutionally.

The SC struck out the standing order 109(3) which says a Deputy Speaker or any other member presiding shall not retain his original vote while presiding.

It furthered that the Deputy Speaker can be counted during the quorum for decision making according to article 104(1)

READ ALSO:  I'm proud and honoured NDC family is firmly behind me - Mahama

Justice Jones Dotse noted that the full ruling will be made available on Friday, March 11.

By Laud Nartey|3news.com|Ghana


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here