Jean Mensa told me that my concerns against the election results were genuine – Rojo Mettle Nunoo

    0
    5
    Advertisement
    Third witness of the petitioner in the ongoing Election Petition hearing at the Supreme Court, Mr. Robert Joseph Mettle Nunoo, has said in his witness statement that the Chair of the Electoral Commission (EC), Jean Mensa told him that, all the concerns the he had raised in the strong room against the collation of the presidential results were genuine.

    He added that Mrs Mensa told him those concerns were going to be addressed.

    “My colleague, Dr Michael Kpessa-Whyte, and, I on many occasions pointed out errors in the figures and words on the sheets that were brought in which ultimately affected totals and assigned results. This sometimes led to EC officials making phone calls on the basis of which they sought to explain and correct some of the things we pointed out.

    “I cannot tell to whom those phone calls were made. I cannot tell if the calls were to EC officials to some other people who were also involved in collation process.  There was no transparent process in this regard.

    “At a point I went to the office of the Chairperson of the Electoral Commission on 8th December 2020, I wanted to bring to her attention that what was going on in the strong room could not lead to a declaration of the results at the end of the day, as she had promised the country. She actually told me, in response, that the concerns I had raised were genuine and she would have them looked into.”

    “Mrs. Jean Mensa informed me that there had been a meeting held earlier in the day between the Petitioner and the Peace Council, something I was unaware of at the time.

    “After I further drew her attention to some of the issues that were coming up in the interactions in the strong room, she said very directly that we should go and speak with the Petitioner. Having regard to her earlier reference to the meeting between the Peace Council and the Petitioner, which she had obviously been briefed about, I took seriously what she said.

    “I do not think we, who were acting as agents of the Petitioner, should be seen as taking positions which many be contrary to what the Petitioner himself and had conveyed in a meeting that I was unaware of with a body such as the Peace Council which, I know has an important role in resolving disputes in connection with elections and calming tensions in the country.

    “She indicated her own willingness to meet with the Petitioner.”

    Regarding whether or not chairperson of the 1st Respondent, Jean Mensa asked him and Dr Michael Kpessa-Whyte to leave the strong room, he said “Yet my colleague and I realised with shock, on our reaching the residence of the Petitioner that the EC Chairperson was in the process of announcing results. Attempts I made to reach the Chairperson of the EC by telephone for clarification proved futile as she had turned off her phones.”

    Hearing of the case resumes Friday February 5.

    By Laud Nartey|3news.com|Ghana

    ]]>