Advertisement
Desktop970x250
Advertisement
Desktop970x250

Dismissal of Abdulai’s review application on Deputy Speakers satisfactory – AG

By Laud Nartey
SHARE
3 min read
Dismissal of Abdulai’s review application on Deputy Speakers satisfactory – AG

The Attorney General’s office has welcomed the dismissal of the review application of the Supreme Court ruling on Deputy Speakers filed by Justice Abdulai.

Speaking to journalists after the dismissal of the application on Tuesday April 26, Deputy Attorney General, Diana Asonaba Dapaah said “The Supreme Court ruled that the application by Justice Abdulai is unmeritorious. I am satisfied with the ruling of the court.”

Justice Abdulai however said posterity will be the best judge following the dismissal of his application.

Also speaking to journalists after the dismissal of his application he said “I think we have to move on as a nation. What I didn’t want was the situation where posterity will question us as to why we didn’t take this small window of opportunity that was available to us for a possible review of the decision of the of the Supreme Court on the 9th of March.

“I think posterity will judge our call in the positive light that we did everything we ought to have done to get the sort of judgement that we needed but this is what the Supreme Court says and we all have to live by that.”

Abdulai’s review application was dismissed on grounds that it is unmeritorious.

Abdulai filed for a review of the Supreme Court’s ruling on the right of Deputy Speakers to vote in Parliament.

The apex court on Wednesday March 9 dismissed an application to pronounce as unconstitutional, Joseph Osei Wusu’s action of counting himself for the purposes of quorum.

Justice Jones Dotse ruled that the Deputy Speaker of Parliament participation in voting was constitutional.

Earlier, Justice Abdulai subsequent to the November 30, 2021 clash between Speaker Bagbin and his First Deputy after the latter overturned an earlier vote of the House rejecting Government’s 2022 Budget invited the Supreme Court to pronounce as unconstitutional, Deputy Speaker, Joseph Osei Owusu’s action of counting himself for the purposes of quorum.

He argued in the context of articles 102 and 104 of the 1992 Constitution that the Deputy Speaker was not permitted to count himself for the purposes of quorum, since he had neither an original nor a casting vote as Speaker presiding.

But the 7-member panel of justices ruled that the Member of Parliament for Bekwai exercised his right constitutionally.Statement-of-case-Justice-Abdulai-vs-The-Attorney-GeneralDownload

The SC struck out the standing order 109(3) which says a Deputy Speaker or any other member presiding shall not retain his original vote while presiding.

It furthered that the Deputy Speaker could be counted during the quorum for decision making according to article 104(1).

By Laud Nartey|editors.3news.com|Ghana

Sign up to The Daily Briefing

Stay informed with the most relevant stories shaping Ghana and the world, every morning and evening.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy.

Share This Article

Laud Nartey is an online editor with current affair team at Media General, operators of TV3 Ghana, 3News.com and more. Email: Laud.Nartey@editors.3news.com

Advertisement
Desktop300x250

Up Next

Advertisement
Desktop970x250